Introduction: The life of any seminarian consists of continuous consumption of new reading material, reflecting and writing. That regular pattern has taken away considerable amounts of "free time" which I might otherwise use to blog. Thus, to maintain some form of connection to those of you who share a concern in my journey, I've decided to post a few of the reflections submitted to the professors.
Today and tomorrow I will be posting from my liturgics class.
Reading Reflection A Theology of Worship
There are two things that especially struck me as important as I was reading A Theology of Worship this week. The chapter on Music and the chapter on the Sacraments each provided much to think about as I think about planning worship in a particular context.
In “Whose Music?” I found it interesting to think about how music has influenced my own faith. My first official place of service within the church was in choir. I have long held to the idea that to sing is to pray twice. Through the singing of hymns, I have both said Amen and been left with a strange and uncomfortable feeling. I think we have all experienced an internal rejection of one hymn claim or another as we have participated in Ecumenical gatherings. Of course not all hymns are prayers. Some pieces of music serve, as Weil points out, essentially to fill the silence which would otherwise occur due to the liturgical actions taking place at the altar. The music serves to fill silent space, and asking “whose music?” is to respect the diversity of contexts in which the Episcopal Church lives out a faithful presence. Respecting creative diversity which arises as a result of cultural diversity is important in the work of extending the reign of God in the world.
“Whose Sacraments?” was very thought provoking, helping me reflect on the influence of individualistic thinking upon the Christian life. Louis Weil writes, in A Theology of Worship “Sacramental actions always pertain to the corporate life of the whole Christian community and their purpose is to build up its unity in a common life and faith. That is why I emphasize so strongly the importance of a shared recognition of what these actions mean within a Christian Community. That meaning is never a private or individual matter.” (125) As I was reading these words I found myself saying both yes and no. Yes, because I see that Baptism is a communal action. And yes because I also could not imagine Holy Communion, the Eucharist, being something one did alone. The no arises as I reflect on the words I remember saying often as a part of the liturgy which asks of God that we “would not take (of communion) for solace only but also for strength.” These words have always seemed to me to be spoken as an individual request. Yes, as we say the words together, a corporate request is being formed as well as an individual supplication. This idea, of thinking of communion not as an individual pietistic expression, but as a communal recognition and strengthening will be a place of continuing reflection for me. It will probably significantly influence my preaching, as I have often spoken of receiving communion as a means of grace, thinking in terms of the relationship between the individual and God. So the question I would ask of Weil is, aren’t the sacraments both individual and communal?
No comments:
Post a Comment